People should not be killed because of hate speech.
Metrics locked
Sign in to view your impact
Persuasiveness, credibility, and influence metrics are only tracked for registered debaters.
Continue exploring discussions as a guest, then authenticate to sync activity to your profile.
Debate focus
Freedom of Speech
No description provided.
Activity
30-day signal flow
New debates, contributions, and reactions tied to this topic.
Activity score
55/100
6 total signals
Positions
1
Contributions
4
Reactions
1
Positions active
2
Contributions
5
Last 30d snapshot
Positions
Arguments on the table
Freedom of speech prevents government retribution, not private businesses.
Community feed
Recent contributions
jmarshallwalker42
8d agoOn: Freedom of speech prevents government retribution, not private businesses.
Freedom of speech prevents government retribution, not private businesses.
Intent summary: The contributor aims to clarify the limits of freedom of speech regarding government and private businesses.
jmarshallwalker42
22d agoOn: People should not be killed because of hate speech.
I also agree.
Intent summary: The contributor expresses agreement with the position.
jmarshallwalker42
23d agoOn: People should not be killed because of hate speech.
I agree completely!
Intent summary: The contributor expresses agreement with the position on hate speech.
jmarshallwalker42
23d agoOn: People should not be killed because of hate speech.
I fully agree.
Intent summary: The contributor expresses agreement with the position that hate speech should not lead to violence.
Positions
Argument map
People should not be killed because of hate speech.
Freedom of speech prevents government retribution, not private businesses.
Evidence
Source library
No evidence has been attached yet. Add sourced material to boost credibility.
Community feed
Live contributions
jmarshallwalker42
8d agoOn: Freedom of speech prevents government retribution, not private businesses.
Freedom of speech prevents government retribution, not private businesses.
Intent summary: The contributor aims to clarify the limits of freedom of speech regarding government and private businesses.
jmarshallwalker42
22d agoOn: People should not be killed because of hate speech.
I also agree.
Intent summary: The contributor expresses agreement with the position.
jmarshallwalker42
23d agoOn: People should not be killed because of hate speech.
I agree completely!
Intent summary: The contributor expresses agreement with the position on hate speech.
jmarshallwalker42
23d agoOn: People should not be killed because of hate speech.
I fully agree.
Intent summary: The contributor expresses agreement with the position that hate speech should not lead to violence.
jmarshallwalker42
41d agoOn: People should not be killed because of hate speech.
We should not be allowed to kill a person, regardless how reprehensible their speech may be.
Intent summary: The contributor asserts that we should not be allowed to kill a person, regardless how reprehensible their speech may be and seeks evidence-backed discussion.